Banker's Manifesto of 1892
Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens.
"We (bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion.
Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.
The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.
At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome.
This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation.
The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.
When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers.
People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world.
While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism. The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.
By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."
As is confirmed at the end of this article, the author remains "unknown". Though while we don't know who wrote it, one thing is for sure, if the author is a conspiracy theorist he has certainly covered every possible one. Always remember folks, Truth is much stranger than fiction.
David Butterfield - Human Rights Educator
$100,000 MISTAKE (FISHERMEN'S LOAN)
Royal Bank of Canada (RBC Bank): CorporateBully.ca {click}
My loan was for $38,000 over 5 years with principal payments of $7,600 per year plus interest, 3% above prime. The total interest for the year would be approximately $500 x 12 months = $6,000 plus $7,600 principal. This sum of $13,600 would be paid once yearly in compliance with the demand installment loan contract.
This loan is consistent with seasonal employment, where your earnings are time dependent.
The Royal Bank mailed a letter to me 10 months into this loan requesting that I had monthly interest payments overdue. It was never discussed verbally or typed on this loan contract, that interest was to be paid monthly.
The Royal Bank based this argument on the terms and conditions which are relevant to the demand loan agreement or contract. The loan contract lacked sufficient details in respect to payment guidelines (monthly interest and payment dates); therefore this voided any loan terms and conditions.
I refused to agree with them; therefore, the Royal Bank seized my 32' fiberglass fishing boat which I used as security on this loan. The Royal Bank sold my boat for 50% of true market value. The loss of my boat and earnings that fall contributed to me losing ownership of my house also.
The Royal Bank sold my house well below assessment plus hired a local company to dispose of my equipment on this property. Royal Bank officials stated later that my equipment was taken to the local dump. I found out that my equipment was sold and not disposed of. Eventually, I had to file personal bankruptcy. Previous to this I had impeccable credit.
I contacted the Ombudsman (Wendy Knight, RBC Financial Group, Toronto, Ontario) who investigated my complaint. This investigation concluded that she could make no recommendation on this case and thus declined my complaint. My next step was contacting the OBSI (Ombudsman for Banking Services & Investments). They also favored the lower decision of the RBC Ombudsman.
Both organizations never contacted or questioned the loan manager (RBC) who signed this loan. These organizations are all funded by the banking industry; therefore, any investigations done by them are likely biased in favor of the banks.
The loan manager who signed this contract worked 18 years for the Royal Bank of Canada. This employee either quit or was fired by the Royal Bank of Canada.
The bottom line is the Royal Bank of Canada made a mistake at the local level that caused me financial ruin.
Join the "Grievance Committee" against Royal Bank of Canada incompetence. This committee will pursue financial reimbursement to dissatisfied clients of the Royal Bank. Please call Paul Fraser at 902-565-3521 or email coldwaterfish@ns.sympatico.ca
Best Regards,
Paul G Fraser
Sydney, NS
Banksters and John Dempsy
John Dempsy one of Canada's Good Guys!
John Dempsy
“The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later, is:
The People vs. The Banks"
Lord Acton, Historian,
1834 - 1902
JOHN DEMPSEY AND LOVEY CRIDGE TEAMED UP TO FILE THE BIGGEST TAX FRAUD CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF CANADA (THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT)
...THE BOGUS INCOME TAX ACT CASE.
"And you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." John 8:32 National Press Release
New Westminster, B.C., April 15, 2005. John Ruiz Dempsey BSCr, LL.B, a criminologist and forensic litigation specialist filed a class action suit on behalf of the People of Canada alleging that financial institutions are engaged in illegal creation of money. The complaint filed Friday April 15, 2005 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at New Westminster, alleges that all financial institutions who are in the business of lending money have engaged in a deliberate scheme to defraud the borrowers by lending non-existent money which are illegally created by the financial institutions out of “thin air.” Dempsey claims that creation of money out of nothing is ultra vires these defendants’ charter or granted corporate power and therefore void and all monies loaned under false pretence contravenes the Criminal Code. The suit which is the first of its kind ever filed in Canada which could involve millions of Canadians alleges that the contracts entered into between the People (“the borrowers”) and the financial institutions were void or voidable and have no force and effect due to anticipated breach and for non-disclosure of material facts. Dempsey says the transactions constitutes counterfeiting and money laundering in that the source of money, if money was indeed advanced by the defendants and deposited into the borrowers’ accounts, could not be traced, nor could not be explained or accounted for.
The suit names Envision Credit Union (“Envision”), a credit union; Laurentian Bank of Canada (“Laurentian Bank”), Royal Bank of Canada (“Royal Bank”), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”), Bank of Montreal (“BOM”), TD Canada Trust (“Canada Trust”) and Canadian Payment Association (“CPA”) as civil conspirators. The plaintiff in the lawsuit is seeking recovery of money and property that was lost by way of confiscation through illegal “debt” collection and foreclosure. The Plaintiff is also seeking for the return of the equities which rightfully belongs to the People of Canada, now being held by the defendant financial institutions as constructive trustees without color of right.
At all material times, these defendant banks and all of them have no legal standing to lend any money to borrowers, because:
1) these banks and credit unions did not have the money to lend, and therefore they did not have any capacity to enter into a binding contract;
2) the defendants did not have any cash reserve, they are not legally permitted to lend their depositor’s or member’s money without expressed written authorization form the depositors, and:
3) the defendants have no tangible assets of their own to lend and all their “assets” are “paper assets” which are mainly in the form of “receivables” created by them out of “thin air,” derived out of loans whereas the monies loaned out were also created out of thin air. Other than bookkeeping and computer entries, no money or substance of any value was loaned by the defendants to the Plaintiff.
In all of the loan transactions entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, the financial institutions did not bring any equity to any of the transaction. All the equities were provided by the borrowers. The practices of the defendant financial institutions alleged in the complaint starkly contrast the practices of responsible and ethical money lenders who actually lend real, tangible, legal tender cash money.
The complaint alleges that the loan transactions are fraudulent because no value was ever imparted by the defendants to the Plaintiff; these defendants did not risk anything, nor lost anything and never would have lost anything under any circumstances and therefore no lien has been perfected according to law and equity against the Plaintiff.
The foreclosure proceedings which comes as a result of the borrower defaulting on such fraudulent loans were carried out in bad faith by the defendant banks and credit unions, and as such, these foreclosures were in every respect unlawful acts of conversion and unlawful seizure of property without due process of law which always results in the unjust enrichment of the defendants.
The suit alleges that the defendants utilize fraudulent banking practices whereby they deceive customers into believing that they are actually receiving “credit” or money when in fact no actual money is being loaned to their customers. However, the complaint describes a practice whereby there is realistically no money other than ledger or computer entries being loaned to the borrowers. Rather than real money being received by the borrowers, “electronic” or “digitally created money”, created out of nothing, at no cost to the financial institutions are entered as “loans” into their customers’ accounts. The borrowers are then required to pay criminal interest rates for the money they never received. The suit alleges that the defendants effectively turn consumers into virtual debt slaves, forcing them to pay for something they never received, and then seizing their properties if they can no longer pay the banks with real money.
There is no law in Canada that could remotely suggest that the defendant financial institutions have the legal right to create money out of nothing. Dempsey says: “only God has the power to create anything out of nothing.” The class action suit, the first and the biggest of its kind in Canada is intended to give the justice system the opportunity to prove itself to the People of Canada who is really in control or whether they would continue to allow itself to be used by the banks as a tool in their unlawful and fraudulent banking practices which always ends in the enslavement of the people and confiscation of the people’s properties.
<><><>
communicationagents.com blog has posted some updates by John, but you need to scroll down to view them.
John, as a trustee of Sovereign Trust (see our Bankruptcy Elimination page), recently shut down Washington State and all the 'big banks' when they resorted to unproven slanderous allegations. Here is just a taste of what is contained in the short 10 page legal document dated February 9 2009 that you can read (as html) and download (as pdf - which includes official seal of Washington State notary) by clicking here. Now check this out:
It is now Public Record that the judgment debtors, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS have failed to produce any evidence because they have failed to respond to this Public Notice within 14 days. By failing to post the required bond to match the bonds posted by Sovereign Trust, the State of Washington by respondiat superior have agreed to pay damages to Sovereign Trust and all of its members, the amount of $1,280,000,000.00 USD (One Billion Two Hundred Eighty Million United States Dollars). This administrative judgment shall be a permanent, irrevocable charge against the State of Washington and all of the people responsible and liable for publishing and dissemination of slanderous, libelous and criminal characterizations of Sovereign Trust and its members.Both parties have agreed that such administrative judgment will be recorded as foreign judgment and recorded in the Office of the Secretary of State as judgment against the State of Washington in the amount of $1,280,000,000.00 USD (One Billion Two Hundred Eighty Million United States Dollars). This judgment shall be irrevocable and cannot be appealed in any court of law.
Both parties have agreed that the judgment debtors shall cease and desist from publishing any further unproven allegations, innuendoes, libelous and damaging materials against Sovereign Trust and its members. The judgment debtors have agreed to pay Sovereign Trust the amount of Ten Million United States Dollars ($10,000,000.00 USD) per day for everyday that such unproven allegations, innuendoes, libelous and damaging materials remain published in the internet or other media.
Few people can do what John does. John knows the ropes. The Mortgage-Rescue® program of Sovereign Trust is a smashing success. What are YOU waiting for? Your family to fall apart? Get out of debt NOW! And get your life back!
John Dempsy:
To all mainstream media in Canada, shame on you. You have sold yourselves to the devil, the banksters and corrupt federal and provincial governments - they love you!
You have kept the truth from being published. Why? Is it because you are being paid big bucks by the banks not to publish the truth about our class action suits, namely: "The People vs. The Banks" and "The People vs. The CRA?"
Are you afraid to publish the truth that the banks illegally create money out of nothing and then lend this counterfeit, non-existent, worthless 'money' to the People?
Are you afraid to expose the truth that the Income Tax Act does not exist and that all de facto corporate federal and provincial governments do not have legal mandate to create laws in Canada?
Are you afraid to publish the truth that Canada does not have a valid and lawful constitution, never had and never will?
How long are you going to keep participating and hiding their fraud?
You hipocrites, don't you know that there is no secret that cannot be revealed?
"For we can do nothing against the truth but for the truth." 2 Corinthians 13:8
